Category: Uncategorized

Revision

mynameismarkstringerLeave a comment
  • As some people can’t always think of anything they would prefer to do, one person is probably still promoting himself as the most understated and exceptionally intriguing artist in London. There has been some gossip to the contrary from differently talented individuals with a passion for bickering (*) and he doesn’t really want to care about this whilst claiming to never have met anyone he doesn’t like. Passion is not always required according to some internally external comments as the technicality for understanding may not always be constant. Past work can involve every genre of the arts in a way that no other person could equal or want to try to and contribution to culture is often beyond remarkable so perhaps constantly disappearing. This could imply there is no point looking at it, thinking about it or ever buying it as the content may only suggest evidence that everything available was or was not from any open sources. Not knowing anything that any other conceptual artists do not claim to think about from time to time may well be an awareness amongst notions of context with motions toward things that appear to be happening anyway. The internetual intent is almost obviously a thing that has at least if not mostly provided some things. Something is a concept and a concept is something, as are some things that are multiple, happily collected most of the time and apparently at one with everything as there was never a rational question about it. As it is now often only information technology, it doesn’t matter today because it may be tomorrow. It isn’t. If it is then that is not a question and grammatical errors through terrestrial equations, where the autosuggestion of others machinery may lead to accidental proposal that written distribution, around about a mid night day, may actually have or not have any meaning beyond anything implied. Attempts to switch, swap or drop english as a language that is autocapitalised at times, have often lead to upside question marks. After full stops today. Mark as before. First paragraph end*. Start second paragraph*. Marked and reworded with the omission of any relatively recent photography that appeared to refuse to upload anyway. This artist therefore sometimes claims copyright to all photography* that goes on around him, particularly surveillance of himself. Portraits at request are sometimes the best ones that are or were nowhere particularly near the same place as the living connection between the performance of people. Offline cameras and all other utensils beyond the internet will know that they are sometimes virtually inanimate and probably not thinking as they are asleep and, as resale value of anything is often just a meaningless beaurocracy, editing something else* nearly becomes a more interesting project of notable fact for paragraph three. There are very few people that simply write about themselves, perhaps because it is too simple. Perhaps it avoids and embraces notions of personal celebrity simultaneously and perhaps it does not. Three paragraphs* that want to be questioned without seeking attention is too much to ask because it happens everyday somewhere. ***Three paragraphs and all suggestions of editing anything anywhere else have been compressed back into this paragraph as the simple aesthetics of one block of text is all that the artist can do this afternoon as others other than this one may only imagine. **** asterisks. This is / may only obviously almost be an exercise in writing about writing, no question*?* (*) Bickering can relate to whispering about a shortage of pencils, paint and paper weights that are not always very heavy beyond beaurocratic requests for things that don’t always exist, ideas, money, those sorts of things perhaps. *Light philosophy is an area of interest that doesn’t always aspire to becoming too heavily involved in some thought processes represented by the aesthetic quality of words on a page and can sometimes use differing styles that may utilise systems designed for measuring light that may be recorded as various particles appear to travel through spacial dimensions before becoming relatively static upon a surface. Moving on from written words is probably a good idea for now as many people have expressed some seemingly certain variarions of interest and / or understanding of text by this author as it isn’t really about anything. He has frequently been asked to come to a point of some sort, a conclusion perhaps that has not yet occurred, so rendering such requests to be valid but not easily satisfied upon immediate demand. So these words could be considered to have acheived what the author sometimes likes to catagorise as non descriptive writing, such that is more or less grammatically correct in its structure but not specific to anything immediately easily catagorised as anything else beyond abstract. At the time of writing the artist is unaware of any similar work that is is so intentionally meaningless though he is aware of past interpretations of other exhibited statements. His varying definitions of multiple statements may not be of any particular value in their attempts to purely entertain any notions oustide those that are traditionally considered pure entertainment. This could finally bring this possibly circular process to question in comparing written work to other forms of visual creativity that attempt to avoid being categorised. Before that happens Mark would like to point out that, though his work has often been dismissed as pretentious in it’s seemingly worthless approach to some analysis of the minimal as well as egotistical in pure relation to it’s recent refusal to reference anything or anyone other than himself, these are considered as entirely valid responses that may well be most certainly and absolutely entirely enjoyable.